Barriers to Interoperability. Health plans, payers, care providers. Mandates. data transparency, information blocking, HIPAA regulations. Surescripts. Use Cases. Prior Authorizations. Electronic prescribing. Medications. Surescripts

Discussing Barriers to Healthcare Interoperability, Use-Cases, and More – Part 1

By | Events, HCEG Content | No Comments

‘Interoperability’ – particularly between health plans and care providers – has been a high priority of healthcare executives for years. It ranks #6 on the 2021 HCEG Top 10+ list and has an impact on almost every area of healthcare. And recent, still evolving mandates regarding data transparency, information blocking, changes to current HIPAA regulations, and interoperability have placed significant challenges upon the health plans, provider organizations, and the technology partners serving the healthcare industry. Forward-thinking stakeholders are not considering mandates as barriers to healthcare interoperability but rather viewing compliance with mandates as opportunities for ensuring the ongoing viability of their healthcare business models.

In our first Focus Area Roundtable on Interoperability held Tuesday, July 20th, and facilitated by our Focus Area Partner Surescripts, leaders from health plans, health systems, and healthcare provider organizations shared their experience, insight, and information in a roundtable fashion on the topic of Interoperability. Surescripts Tim Capstick and Ashley Clark served as industry thought leaders providing their perspective on these interoperability-related topics, in particular from a health plan point of view.

This post presents the first part of a 2-part series sharing highlights of this first roundtable on interoperability. Leaders of health plans, health systems, and provider organizations are encouraged to participate in upcoming Focus Area Roundtables including the 2nd Interoperability roundtable on September 8th, 2021.

Barriers to Healthcare Interoperability Payers & Providers are Encountering

HCEG’s Executive Director Ferris Taylor kicked off the roundtable by asking participants: What are the barriers to healthcare interoperability that health plans and health systems are encountering with respect to the broad topic of interoperability?

Consent Management – One of the Barriers to Healthcare Interoperability

One participant noted that when deploying interoperability solutions, one of the biggest challenges involves consent management for members and patients. Appropriately managing patient data and providing individuals the ability to weigh in on the sharing of their data is both a technical and policy problem. He noted while their organization is addressing consent management largely on their own, he expects the evolution of privacy laws in California and Europe will likely have a national impact across the United States.

Another participant shared that addressing consent management is key to the future of interoperability – not just between members/patients and their health plan and providers but also when providers are sharing information with other health systems/healthcare providers.

Listen here for more on the importance of consent management in advancing interoperability

Other Barriers to Interoperability for Health Plans and ProvidersHCEG HealthCare Executive Group focus area roundtable Barriers to Healthcare interoperability poll

Participants were presented with a list of potential barriers to interoperability and asked to select two barriers from the perspective of a health plan and a provider.

For health plans, Access to and Integrating Data Sources ranked first followed by Complex Privacy and Security Concerns.

For providers, Internal Challenges with Technology and a Lack of Knowledgeable Resources were identified as key barriers to healthcare interoperability.

Impact of Proposed Modifications to HIPAA’s Privacy Rule on Interoperability

Surescripts Ashley Clark shared that data rights are an issue her organization takes very seriously and that they’re currently looking at CMS legislation regarding expanding the definition of treatment under HIPAA and what information can be shared as medical treatment versus non-treatment. Ashley shared that pending regulation changes will likely open up a lot of doors in terms of information that can be shared on things like medication history.

Another participant shared his perspective on barriers to healthcare interoperability for payers and providers by sharing that from his vantage point he’s seeing tremendous reticence on the part of providers to address interoperability and data transparency in any deep way vis-à-vis their health plan partners; with the exception of some relationships forced by the COVID pandemic.

Who Owns Health Plan Member and Provider-Patient Data?

Health Plan Best Positioned to Own Data - HCEG-Industry Pulse Research Survey 2020

Data Ownership – 2020 Industry Pulse Report

The recent announcement by the Biden Administration to increase penalties on providers who are not making their pricing information available was identified as the first step toward breaking the long-held, culturally ingrained notion that patient care and the information generated from that critical activity belongs to the health system and to the provider community alone.  It was noted cultural acceptance – on the part of both payers and providers – that their existing business models are built on a largely zero-sum game is a large barrier that must be overcome in order for practical interoperability to be widely adopted.

Note: Respondents to the 2020 Industry Pulse Report shared their take on data ownership between payers and providers. See survey results in the graphic on the right.

Listen here to a roundtable participant discuss data ownership among health plans and providers

“Culture eats technology. Culture eats strategy. Culture eats operations. Culture even attempts to eat policy for lunch.” – Roundtable Participant Denny Brennan – Executive Director & Chief Executive Officer of HCEG partner Massachusetts Health Data Consortium

Health Plans as Primary Connection for Patients & Healthcare Consumers

The concept of data hoarding by providers and payers was discussed along with the idea that it’s easier for health plans to surface data than it is for providers to do so. January of 2023 – just over two years away – was noted as a deadline for providers to share almost all of ‘their data’ with health plans. Per the Interoperability and Patient Access final rule (CMS-9115-F), providers will have to send the entire patient medical record to a patient’s current health plan because that health plan is responsible for moving that to the patient’s next health plan.

“I know a lot of regulators and a lot of providers around the country have not yet internalized the idea that the primary connection for the patient is going to be the health plan and that providers are responsible for providing the health plan all the clinical data that’s necessary to maintain that connection. And to inform the patient and make it possible for payer-to-payer connectivity to work.”

RELATED: Key Interoperability, Health Information Technology, and Transparency Policies

How Health Plans Can Best Support Provider Organizations Address Barriers to Healthcare Interoperability

“If I were running a medical group or a community hospital, one of the first things I’d be thinking is:

  • How do I sit down with my major payers and figure out what I can upload?
  • What am I doing that I don’t have to do that payers can pick up with me?
  • How do I cement that partnership by taking over pieces of the business that they insist on taking over that I’m better equipped to do like delivering care to the patient?

I’m the one who’s going to engage the patient. Give me tools, help my staff get trained so that the doctor doesn’t have to talk to the patient about SDOH or the doctor doesn’t have to talk to the patient about their financial exposure.”

Listen here for more on how health plans can help healthcare providers enhance interoperability

Use Cases with Most Potential to Increase Interoperability

Ferris asked participants to share their insight on which use cases might best advance interoperability and improve payer-provider-patient/consumer collaboration.

Increasing Consumer Ownership & Assisting Stakeholders Serve Their Members/Patients

A health plan participant shared that the use cases he sees that have the most impact potential are ones that lead to an increased amount of consumer ownership and activation of the health system to serve the member/patient. He noted that the process of effecting these use cases requires healthcare organizations to face some level of deconstruction. He explained that addressing barriers to interoperability in healthcare means that everyone has to have a relationship with everyone else when it comes to data – and some organizations are uncomfortable with that. So, we have more work to do.

Automating High Friction Activities & Improving Patient Engagement

Another participant shared that his organization separates use cases into two major buckets. One in the realm of automating high friction activities between payers and providers. Frequently occurring activities that can be automated and that are happening in every other industry. And the other in the realm of interventions, population health, or value-based care efforts that actually improve care like patient engagement, chronic disease management, telemedicine, etcetera.  For each bucket he emphasized the importance of each use case:

  • Being capable of being rolled out on their own and in a stepwise fashion to get to some ideal future state.
  • Having deployable value on its own and being able to stand on its own.

As an example of the bucket on the automation side, one of the first things healthcare organizations should address is auto eligibility because something like three-quarters of the calls from providers to their payers is some flavor of eligibility. And, except for a long tale of rare cases, a lot of that is totally automatable.

In a recent Focus Area Roundtable facilitated by HealthSparq, participants discussed how new price transparency mandates will likely help drive opportunities for increased engagement between providers and their patients. Read more about this potential in Payer-Provider Collaboration Critical to Meeting Price Transparency Mandates.

Reshaping Patient Relationships with Providers

Another participant shared that their personal experience is that the patient-provider relationship is typically a transactional relationship – often a negotiation on a chargemaster – and that increased interoperability seems to have the potential at least to change that quite dramatically.

Most Impactful Use Cases Identified by Focus Area Roundtable Participants

After discussing interoperability-related use cases, participants responded to a poll on ‘Which interoperabiliHCEG HealthCare Executive Group focus area roundtable Barriers to Healthcare interoperability Use Cases pollty use cases offer the most opportunity to advance patient-payer-provider collaboration?’ This question was asked from the perspective of both health plans and providers and the following were equally ranked for both health plans and providers:

  • Shortening or Automating Prior Authorizations
  • Providing Pricing Data to Patients & Providers

Electronic Prior Authorizations – Webinar on August 25th at 2:00 PM ET

Automating the processing of prior authorizations via ‘electronic prior authorization’ (ePA) – particularly in settings like the pharmacy where a patient may be waiting – can significantly enhance patient/member engagement by reducing the time between a request being made and a patient receiving care. To learn more about the Fast Prior Authorization Technology Highway (Fast PATH) initiative launched by AHIP and several health plans, consider attending Electronic Prior Authorization: The Fast PATH Towards Better Patient Care on August 25, 2021 at 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM ET.

Cutting Through Administrative Chaos by Focusing on Specific High-Value Use Cases

Surescripts Ashley Clark shared some actions that can be performed to cut through the chaos of everything that’s going on administratively at health plans and provider organizations. These included:

  • Driving adoption and usage of a limited set of use cases by getting very specific about those use case
  • How achieving success with a limited set of use cases can lead to bigger decisions across the board.
  • Being very detailed about the information that is being shared back and forth so that it’s not seen as if irrelevant information were overlooked

Listen here for more from Surescripts Ashley Clark on cutting through administrative chaos

Plans and Providers Working Together to Avoid Duplicative Efforts

One participant whose organization is closely engaged with supporting provider organizations shared that when meeting with providers and health plans they talk regularly about “You both are doing the same things, you call them the same things. They’re a little bit different but why are you both doing Population Health Management?” He commented: “I don’t understand why people who are battling it out on engaging the patient are battling it out on collaboration at the level of administering clinical process.”

Who’s Best Positioned, Qualified, and Equipped to Own Specific Interoperability Use Cases

After discussing interoperability-focused use cases, roundtable participants shared their take on additional considerations regarding involvement and ownership. The following points were raised:

  • Health plans are much better equipped to do population health management.
  • Providers are much better equipped to deal with care requirements and patients in real-time.
  • Everybody is investing in systems that are enormously expensive.
  • Providers are spending a lot of money on tools that if they had better collaborative relationships with payers, they wouldn’t have to invest in.

Payers and providers each need to ask: What does practical interoperability mean for our business and how do we design our businesses?

Listen here for more from roundtable participants on interoperability-related use cases

Informing Care Decisions & Providing Insights to Either Side of the Network

As an individual who works directly with payers and who has colleagues working directly with providers, Tim Capstick shared that Surescripts tends to focus on informing care decisions, providing insights across the network to both sides of the network, and enhancing the prescribing process for providers.

Tim shared that on the payer side there is a lot of concern and issue around the consistency in which providers are utilizing enhanced prescribing services, what providers are getting out of prescription services enhanced by interoperability and the overall return on investment? And on the provider side: what is the quality of this information that’s being presented? Is data consistently being presented and can the data be trusted?

Listen here for more from Surescripts Tim Capstick on informing care decisions and increasing the adoption of interoperability use cases.

Additional Interoperability-related Topics of Discussion – Coming in Part 2

The first Focus Area Roundtable on Interoperability facilitated by Surescripts covered a lot of areas of interest to participants – way more than can be reasonably shared in a single post. In the second part of this two-part recap, information on the following will be shared:

  • Trust, quality, and scarcity as a mechanism for increasing adoption of interoperability use cases
  • The importance of balancing the amount of information payers share with providers
  • Interoperability’s increasing importance and impact on value-based arrangements
  • The importance of workflow
  • An interesting comment about charging for access to healthcare data and how another participant responded

Come Learn More & Share Your Insight

Our second Focus Area Roundtable on Interoperability takes place on Tuesday, September 8th at 10:00 AM PT / 2:00 PM ET and will build upon the topics shared in the first roundtable. In addition, our Focus Area Partner Surescripts will share information on and respond to participant challenges, issues, and opportunities regarding interoperability collected in advance of the roundtable.  Leaders of health plans, health systems, and provider organizations can request an invite here.

Special thanks to Ashley Clark and Tim Capstick of our sponsor Surescripts for sharing their unique insight in this roundtable. For information on any of the topics presented in this post, contact Tim Capstick or Ashley Clark.

To receive additional information on interoperability and other healthcare leader priorities on the 2021 HCEG Top 10+ list, subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Payer-Provider Collaboration Critical to Meeting Price Transparency Mandates

By | Events, HCEG Content | No Comments
  • Ignoring price transparency mandates will not make them go away

  • Will the No Surprises Act be the dagger in the heart of fee-for-service payments?

  • What changes to the No Surprises Act may be coming? And when?

  • Will Advanced EOB’s force payers and providers to collaborate more?

  • How might price transparency impact the workflow of health plans and providers?

  • Will price transparency regulations help patient engagement? Or create a customer service nightmare?

Our second Focus Area Roundtable on Price Transparency – facilitated by HealthSparq – took place on Wednesday, June 16th and members of the HCEG Network and industry thought leaders including Denny Brennan, Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of HCEG partner Massachusetts Health Data Consortium (MHDC), raised and explored these and other questions.

Ferris Taylor kicked off the roundtable by asking Matt Parker, Vice-President of Products at HealthSparq, to frame the conversation by sharing a highlight of the keynote presentation “Path to Transparency – Increasing Access, Lowering Costs, and Driving Value that Matt presented along with two other healthcare leaders at the World Health Care Congress Virtual 2021 conference.

Price Transparency – Part of the Foundation for Patient Engagement

Matt Parker related that the Transparency in Coverage Mandate and No Surprises Act presents unique challenges for health plan payers and providers that can only be addressed via increased collaboration. Matt shared that price transparency is just a tool, a component to facilitate payer and provider interaction with their members and patients – not an end in itself but rather something for helping members, patients and providers better understand available provider networks, find care when they need it, engage with the system, and understand what costs are going to be – from both the member, patient, and provider perspective.

Matt suggested this price transparency foundation is the floor on which health plans and providers can build more holistic engagement with their members and patients.

RELATED: Recap of 1st Focus Area Roundtable on Price Transparencyhealthcare transparency in coverage. No surprises act. healthsparq price transparency

Building Upon the Floor Established by Price Transparency Mandates

To build upon the idea of compliance with transparency mandates as the floor, a health plan participant asked: How do we separate the basic needs of meeting the mandate from the next phase once pricing data is out there? And once basic needs are met, how can we then use that accomplishment to do things to support our members to engage with our providers more effectively? How can we help members with their provider relationship?

These few questions and others raised by participants affiliated with both health plans and provider organizations shaped the discussion and interaction throughout the roundtable.

Primary Topics Discussed by Roundtable Participantshealthcare data interoperability surescripts focus area roundtable HCEG

Our Focus Area Roundtables are informal discussions where all participants can contribute insight and raise questions. This post presents a number – but not all – of the contributions made by roundtable participants. Additional content will be shared in future posts, our social channels, and in future roundtables. To receive additional information on this and other Focus Area Roundtables, join our newsletter, follow @hcexecgroup on Twitter, connect with us on LinkedIn, and consider participating in upcoming roundtables.

RELATED: Join our Interoperability roundtable on July 20, 2021 at 10:00 AM PT / 1:00 PM ET

Who’s on First? Low Levels of Initial Compliance Due to Confusion?

One participant referenced a recent study published by JAMA that noted low compliance with the price transparency mandate by hospitals. In response, another participant noted that at his health plan, there was confusion about what is required and who is responsible for compliance with current price transparency mandates.  He noted that some staff were not aware of the upcoming January 2022 price transparency deadline for health plans, or thought it was provider-related, not health plan-related.

To be clear, while there are price transparency mandates for both providers and health plans, the JAMA study referenced the hospital-related mandate effective earlier this year on January 1st. Effective dates for price transparency-related mandates for health plans and the specific capabilities required are noted in the following table:

Transparency in Coverage Mandate – Health Plan/Payer

January 2022 Public access to pricing data through machine-readable files
January 2023 Personalized, out-of-pocket estimates via online, self-service tools
January 2023 Pricing data available for 500 services
January 2023 Pricing data available for all covered services via online tools or print delivery

No Surprises Act – Health Plan/Payer

Cost-sharing price comparison by phone or internet for specific service/item
Advance EOB w/ provider and contracted rate for in-network services. Out-of-pocket cost estimate for Out-of-Network services at least 3 days in advance
Provider directories updated & verified every 90 days w/ info updated within 2 business days of receipt. Health plan process for organizations not responsive to verification attempts.
RELATED: Diving into the Details: What You Need to Know About the Machine-Readable Files Mandate

Ideal Outcomes of Payer-Provider Compliance with Price Transparency Mandates

From a health plan perspective, compliance with price transparency mandates should help providers deliver care more effectively – as viewed by the patient. From the provider’s standpoint, a tighter integration with their health plans should enable providers to answer pricing questions from their patients.

If Mandates are Ignored, Will They Go Away – Or At Least Be Delayed?

Transparency in Coverage Mandate and No Surprises Act

MHDC’s Denny Brennan shared how some provider and payer organizations are viewing the mandates:

‘Perhaps there’s a bit of willful denial about sharing data partly driven by the fact that pricing information has long been held on the provider side in chargemasters, which are notoriously poorly maintained files with respect to what the patient’s actual exposure will be. Providers and plans are still looking at pricing data as part of their proprietary contracting process and may be essentially ignoring the mandate.’

Denny also offered that the idea of sharing pricing data hasn’t settled in across the industry because health plans are waiting for providers to take the lead and many providers are thinking: “We don’t know how to do that, we don’t know if we want to do that, and if we pretend it’s not happening, it may go away – especially because so many things have been pulled back with COVID-19.”

RELATED: Meeting Transparency Mandates: Put Your Employer Groups at Ease

Delays to No Surprises Act – Likely Clarified by August 2021

Ferris asked HealthSparq’s Matt Parker if he anticipated that the payer-side legislation might get delayed. Matt stated that while the Transparency in Coverage rules are finalized in theory, will take place over the next few years as defined, and will likely not be changed, there are not any sufficiently defined rules pertaining to transparency-related parts of the No Surprises Act – including the Advanced EOB requirements.  Matt also shared that updates to the No Surprises Act are likely to be released next month in July.

Listen here for more on potential delays to the No Surprises Act.

Other Mandates Taking Precedence over Transparency?

Participants noted that other regulations, mandates, and rules are taking precedence over – or at least complicating compliance with – the Transparency in Coverage Mandate and No Surprises Act including:

An Old Cliché Rings True: Garbage In – Garbage Out

One participant with decades of experience serving health plans noted that 80-90% of medical bills have errors of some type and this means that price transparency and data sharing mandates are starting from a system that is already error-laden. Accuracy needed to automate information interchange does not always exist and we have to clean up our act before we put it on stage.

She echoed questions posed by her clients:

  • Where am I going to pull this data from?
  • How am I going to get this out of my systems into data files?
  • Who are knowledgeable partners that can help with the generation and hosting of machine-readable files?
RELATED: Understanding the Transparency in Coverage Mandate

Health Plans as Definitive Sources of Health Information

On the topic of who’s best positioned to serve the information needs of members and patients, Denny shared that:

“What we’re telling our members is, and this is a tough message for the provider community, is that the route by which patients/members/consumers will be getting their health data is through their health plan. And the regular interchange and exchange of data between health plans and providers is great for providers who need to manage care. But providers are not envisioned in the rules as being the definitive source of patients/member/consumer health information – that’s going to be coming through their health plan.”

Incomplete and Insufficiently Specified Rules Hamper Meaningful Transparency

Healthcare data includes administrative, clinical, and financial data held by both providers and health plans and subject to HIPAA and other federal and state regulations. Denny shared his take on challenges health plans and providers are encountering due to insufficiently detailed regulations and unresolved elements of payer-provider-consumer interoperability for the purposes of value-based care.

Listen here for more on considerations regarding the current state of interoperability rules.

Advanced EOB’s – Forcing Payer-Provider Collaboration & Impacting Workflow Providers?

Providers need to be able to sufficiently integrate with health plans to get a fairly accurate estimate of the cost of specific procedures. Matt shared his take on the Advanced Explanation of Benefits (EOB) portion of the No Surprises Act and suggests it will force payers and providers to create a technology solution in their workflow.

Listen here for more on the impact of Advanced EOB’s.

RELATED: Advance EOB, Patient/Consumer Protections, and Reporting

No Surprises Act – The Dagger in the Heart of Fee-For-Service?Price Transparency Mandate Kills Fee-for-Service Payment. Value-based payment models

MHDC’s Denny Brennan shared his take on how the movement to more transparency and interoperability mandates may speed the movement to value-based payment arrangements.

“One of the things that I infer from these discussions is that the No Surprises Act is almost a forcing function. As I’ve said to members of our group, if there was ever a dagger, that could be driven into the heart of fee-for-service medicine, it’s the No Surprises Bill. Because in order to prop this thing up and to burden the physician with telling the patient at the point of care that: “Well we want to get you an MRI but if we get it down the street instead of in our own network you’ll save more money.” And physicians hate that. They don’t want to have those conversations. It’s hard enough to get physicians to talk about social determinants of health.

Listen here for more on the potential impact on fee-for-service payment models.

Impact of Increased Transparency on Customer Service

In response to participants’ discussion about transparency mandates forcing greater adoption of value-based care models, Ferris asked whether there might be a consumer backlash based on missing or inaccurate pricing information and how it might be solved. One participant predicted a customer service nightmare for health plans and providers, and another stated that it’s a problem that is going to be solved by a crowd – not by individual organizations.

Listen here for more on the potential impact of mandate compliance on customer service.

RELATED: Price Transparency Resources for Health Plans

Connect with Others Facing Similar Challenges

Special thanks to Matt Parker and HealthSparq for their role as our Focus Area Partner for Price Transparency. For more information on the meeting and exceeding price transparency mandates and to learn more about topics presented in this post, check out HealthSparq’s website and contact HealthSparq here.

If you’re a leader of a health plan, health system, or hospital/provider organization, consider joining future Focus Area Roundtables on Price Transparency, Interoperability, NextGen/Value Payment Models, and Healthcare Policy & ACA. We have other Focus Areas of the 2021 HCEG Top 10+ under development.Healthcare Executive Group Focus Area Partners HealthSparq Softheon Surescripts Zelis

Insight on Using Data & Analytics to Address Healthcare Consumer Needs. HCEG Top 10. Member Data. Insights. Pre-Authorization Process. HCEG. WHCC.

Insight on Using Data & Analytics to Address Healthcare Consumer Needs

By | Events, Partners | No Comments

Health plans have more data and analytics than they typically know what to do with.  The challenge is to use new types of data and advanced analytics like artificial intelligence and machine learning to derive insights and actionable information that all stakeholders – healthcare consumers, providers, and payers – can use to facilitate access, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. It’s no wonder that Data & Analytics consistently ranks high on the annual HCEG Top 10 list of challenges, issues, and opportunities facing healthcare leaders.

On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, HCEG Executive Director Ferris Taylor moderated “Use Data to Uncover Insights and Create Actionable Strategies that Address Member Needs,” a webinar hosted by our partner World Health Care Congress with the following healthcare leader panelists:

This post shares highlights of some of the insight, expertise, and experiences shared by the above executives during the webinar. Access a recording of the webinar here and hear from the panelists themselves at the [specified recording time] listed with each of the session highlights presented below.

Strategic Focus on Using Data & Analytics to Find New, Actionable Insights

Ferris Taylor kicked off the discussion by asking panelists to introduce themselves and to share, from a strategic point of view, a quick overview of how they are using data and analytics to find new and actionable insights.

Leveraging Social Determinants of Health

Sherri Zink shared her organization’s focus on improving member engagement by leveraging different data across multiple silos – including social determinants of health data from 3rd parties – to help providers engage with plan members on a more holistic basis.  Listen at [00:04:41]

Anticipating Member Needs & Personalizing Interactions via Workflow

Shawn Wang offered how his health plan is better anticipating members’ needs and personalizing interactions via existing workflows.  Listen at [00:07:30] for more on:

  • Importance of embedding data and AI insight into workflows
  • Personalizing member interactions with personalized care plans, personalized news, and personal topics that address member needs.
  • Reducing overall burden by removing complexity from staff member jobs

Earning Trust of Members By Giving Them Something in Return

Mohammad Jouni shared how technology partners can support health plan member’s medical needs and administrative needs as members are interacting with health plans during other customer service events. Listen at [00:09:37]

RELATED: Leadership, Trust & Skills in Overcoming Obstacles to Radical Innovation in HealthcareInsight on Using Data & Analytics to Address Healthcare Consumer Needs. HCEG Top 10. Member Data. Insights. Trust. Process. HCEG. WHCC.

Uncovering Insights & Actionable Information: Opportunities, Challenges, & Points of Pain

Panelists shared information on the pain points and challenges that their health plan or health plan customers have addressed or still trying to address in making data and analytical tools actionable to support the relationships between the health plan, the consumer, and the provider.

Supplying Business Partners with Meaningful, Actionable Data

Sherri conveyed the importance of taking advantage of teachable moments during member interactions with customer service, capturing and leveraging unstructured data presented during interactions, and making data and analytics available in downstream systems and to provider partners. Listen to Sherri at [00:12:22]

Importance of Thinking About Data from Standpoint of Member, Not the Organization

Many health plans organize their company by functions and not around the member. Shawn shared his thoughts on the importance of a cohesive, end-to-end process, using data from the member’s viewpoint and not from an organizational standpoint, and embedding data and analytics into organizational workflows.  Shawn shares at [00:17:30]

Importance of Member Trust & Trust in the Process

Mohammad talked about the need to earn member trust and how vendors who establish trust with plan members can do a lot for the member that health plans or providers might otherwise not easily accomplish.  Listen at [00:33:33]

Applications Having Greatest Impact from Data & Analytics

Sherry shared insight on what applications are having the greatest impact from improved data and analytics, the need for member trust, and how Net Promoter Scores are impacted. Listen at [00:36:13]

Major Impact on Reducing Duration of Pre-Authorization Process

Shawn shared how high-volume, complex back-office processes like pre-authorization and other utilization management functions benefit greatly from improved data and analytical capabilities. Listen at [00:40:48]

RELATED: Healthcare System Interoperability – The Key To The Care We All Strive For

Vendor Interactions Impact on Health Plan Member Satisfaction

Mohammad stated that closing gaps in care is one of the areas seeing the greatest impact from data and analytics. He noted how new insights on member needs and member interactions with 3rd party vendors and their offerings are positively impacting plan member satisfaction and trust. Listen at [00:43:55]

Integrating New Data into Analytics and Tools Provided to Providers and Consumers

Ferris stated that there are lots of different tools out there and that it seems like data and tools are multiplying every six months. Ferris asked: As health plans, how are you integrating new data into the analytics and the tools that you’re providing to your consumers?

LISTEN to Sherri’s thoughts on the following topics at [00:46:55]

  • Insight on downstream operational systems and legacy applications
  • Making sure data produced in upstream systems is available in downstream operational systems
  • Mapping clinical data, financial data, administrative data – structured & unstructured – on-premises & cloud-based
  • Integrating 3rd party data – particularly social determinants of health

LISTEN to Shawn’s thoughts on the following topics at [00:49:43]

  • Organizing and consolidating data – Key to scaling integration capabilities
  • Capturing insight from audio interactions & acting on that insight near real-time
  • Updating analytic models frequently and timely deployment to downstream systems

RELATED: Healthcare Price Transparency – Leaders Share Insight – Part 1

Attendee Questions on Using Data & Analytics to Create Actionable InsightInsight on Using Data & Analytics to Address Healthcare Consumer Needs. HCEG Top 10. Member Data. Insights. Trust. Process. HCEG. WHCC.

Panelists had an opportunity to respond to questions from webinar attendees. Listen in at [00:53:44] to hear panelist responses on questions pertaining to the following:

  • Co-developing a data & analytics strategy with business partners
  • Defining and ranking use cases across all business units
  • Accommodating member/patient communication preferences
  • Example of addressing high-utilizer of ER services
  • Avoid taking a cookie-cutter approach

Panelists Leaders Share One Piece of Advice on Leveraging Data & Analytics

Ferris concluded the discussion by asking panelists to share one piece of advice on the broad topic of data and analytics. Listen at [01:01:58] for panelists responses on the following topics:

  • Ensure alignment with overall strategy & think through the end-to-end process
  • Start with the outcome you want to achieve
  • Demonstrate value early on

Opportunities for Insight and Interaction with Healthcare Leaders

2021 HCEG Top 10+ Focus Areas Interoperability Healthcare Policy

For more insight and information on the challenges, issues, and opportunities facing healthcare leaders, subscribe to our newsletter and check out these on-demand webinars from our partner World Healthcare Congress.

You may also consider joining other healthcare executives and thought leaders for one or more of HCEG’s Focus Area Roundtables. We currently have roundtables on the 2021 HCEG Top 10+ focus areas highlighted in the graphic below and are adding more.

Complete this short form to share which focus areas you are interested in and how you’d like to participate with the HealthCare Executive Group.

 

Price Transparency Compliance Regulations Mandates. Policies, programs, and tools. Data standards. Operational considerations. Increasing adoption. End-user education and support. Payer-provider relationships.

Beyond Price Transparency Compliance – Stakeholder Thoughts – Part 2

By | Events, Resources | No Comments

The Transparency in Coverage Mandate and the No Surprises Act are forcing health plans, health systems, healthcare providers to focus their attention and already overburdened resources on price transparency compliance-related activities. While price transparency mandates and regulations are intended to help make healthcare better and more cost-effective for health plan members and healthcare provider’s patients, there are strategic and tactical reasons to holistically address the following aspects of price transparency:

  • Policies, Programs, & Tools
  • Data Standards, Data Collection & Operational Considerations
  • Increasing End-User Adoption
  • End-user Education & Support
  • Payer-Provider Relationships

In the first post of a two-part series, Healthcare Price Transparency – Leaders Share Insight – Part 1, highlights from our first Focus Area Roundtable on Costs & Transparency held on April 5, 2021 were shared. HCEG members working for health plans, healthcare providers, and healthcare-related technology/service organizations shared their responses to some questions presented by Andy Hoffman and Matt Parker, two thought leaders with our 2021 Focus Area Partner for Costs & Transparency: HealthSparq.

Stakeholder Adoption, End-User Support, & Payer-Provider Relationships

In this second post, comments and insights from Focus Area Roundtable participants on the following aspects of price transparency are presented:

  1. Increasing stakeholder adoption of price transparency tools and services
  2. The importance of end-user education and support
  3. Payer-provider relationships to support access to price transparency information

RELATED: Understanding the Transparency in Coverage Mandate

Increasing Stakeholder Adoption of Price Transparency Tools

I think the concept of just being a liaison will go a long way on either side through this process. (Health Plan)

Go into the prescriber’s workflow with price transparency, going to the physician’s workflow with pricing information that not only saves the system money but that directly affects the consumer in a way that is frictionless. (Industry Analyst)

Whenever these conversations come up, taking a step back and saying [asking] Who’s going to benefit the most? And by that, I mean not just like the individual or the entity but the health system at large. If it doesn’t really waterfall to the whole cost of care and care opportunities, then we’re probably just clogging up the system. Who’s this going to piss off? Who’s going to lose from that deal? Companies taking rebates are going to lose. Companies overcharging and hiding pricing are going to lose. Intermediaries who aren’t necessary may lose. (Industry Analyst)

We’ve kind of assumed that we have to have all of these systems connected and all this interoperability wired in order to do that. But I’ve seen some really successful approaches and getting information into the decision maker’s hands that benefits the end consumer of health. (Industry Analyst)

Take something like hip and knee replacements. There’s an awareness of ambulatory participation, acute participation, post-acute participation on a couple of levels whether that’s brick and mortar and or home on the post-acute side. (Technology Provider)HCEG Focus Area Roundtable. Costs & Price Transparency. Compliance Regulations Mandates. Policies, programs, and tools. Data standards. Operational considerations. Increasing adoption. End-user education and support. Payer-provider relationships.

Health Plan, Health System, & Healthcare Provider Leaders – Click on the Above to Join a Focus Area Roundtable

Importance of End-User Education and Support for Price Transparency

Price transparency has different meanings to different people depending on their roles and expectations. (Provider)

I think hospitals will have to somehow educate patients and that can come in different forms. And whether it’s on a one-on-one setting or more about broader communication, there is an element of patient education that will need to happen. It’s going to be a lot more complex because it’s going to also have to account for the impact of the health plan. So, the education component is going to be large. (Industry Analyst)

I think the reality is most of us don’t really want to solve the problem in terms of us being the recipient of care. So, if I’m a patient, member, consumer, employee, I want the system to fix these things. I want my health plan that I signed up for to be smart. I want my doctor to have information and just do stuff that doesn’t cost me excess money. I want my pharmacist. (Industry Analyst)

We’re in rural areas so that’s a big, big challenge for us. But what does it mean to the consumer? Do they think that when they go in and try this tool that they’re going to understand precisely what the cost of their knee surgery is? And then is it going to be a big dissatisfier when they learned that surgeon had to do something more, or it was more complex than they originally thought? And as a result of that, they disengage. So, will this help or harm them? (Health Plan)

And then there’s the component of things that even an educated consumer might not know about like the anesthesiologist in the acute setting which rarely gets talked about. And then a bill shows up, let alone the medications that are incurred post-acute. (Technology Provider)

We also have a couple, sort of, denominators there. Am I able to figure this out on my own? Do I have search skills? And EOB skills? And ICD-10 code skills? And then the other is: Am I on Medicaid or sort of a capped model where what do I care about the price? (Industry Analyst)

Patient-Physician Relationships May Offset Price Transparency Benefits

I think it’s a personal thing. For surgeries you develop a relationship with your physicians so even if you see a great price somewhere else, I don’t think that people would jump out to go have say like a knee replacement or shoulder replacement or something even more critical with another physician somewhere else. (Provider)

If they have a relation, they tend to sort of stick with what they know. The people that would make the change are not the people that we would see price making the decision from a true consumer choice perspective but those that are just utterly desperate and have, maybe require something that they can’t otherwise get at which is, again, not part of, not really the spirit of the law, per se. (Health Plan/Provider)

RELATED: Healthcare Leaders Focus on Healthcare Policy & ACA

Payer-Provider Relationships Impacts from Price Transparency Compliance

How do you see the relationship between payers and providers in the space of both informing about price transparency but also making sure that the messaging is consistent? Because again, your got contract disputes and a lot of the No Surprise Act is going to come around contract disputes. (Technology Provider)

This [price transparency] could change the relationship between the provider and the payer. And we’re already seeing a lot of movement around mergers and acquisitions and perhaps this would incent that kind of behaviors further – or maybe not. But I think there will be some sort of macro-level impact as this becomes more widespread. (Health Plan)

Well, I think when it comes to that relationship of payer and provider, one key element that’s going to go a long way actually is support. And support probably more for the hospital side because there’s an element of an IT integration of the back end that you have to think about. And how does it all fit together? And what codes they have to integrate through? (Thought Leader)

Join a Focus Area Roundtable – Connect with Healthcare Peers

Additional Focus Area Roundtables on Costs & Transparency – and other 2021 HCEG Top 10+ focus areas such as Healthcare Policy & ACA, Interoperability, and M & A /Joint Ventures, among others – will take place throughout 2021. If you are interested in participating, reach out to us via email or complete this short form to indicate your interests.

To receive recaps of our Focus Area Roundtables and other information of potential use for leaders of health plans, health systems, and healthcare provider organizations, join our newsletter.

Healthcare Price Transparency Price Transparency Regulations & Compliance, Policies, Programs, & Tools, Data Standards & Operational Considerations

Healthcare Price Transparency – Leaders Share Insight – Part 1

By | Events, Resources | 2 Comments

Healthcare price transparency has a lot of attention and focus right now, especially in the mandate-driven space. But addressing price transparency via compliance with regulations is just a portion of what health plans and healthcare provider organizations should be focusing on to help make healthcare better and more cost-effective for their members and patients.

In our first Focus Area Roundtable on Costs & Transparency held April 5, 2021, a group of HCEG members working for health plans, healthcare providers, and healthcare-related technology/service organizations gathered to discuss some of the challenges, issues, and opportunities associated with addressing price transparency.

Challenges, Issues, & Opportunities Beyond Price Transparency Regulations

Andy Hoffman and Matt Parker, two thought leaders with our Focus Area Partner HealthSparq, shared a timeline overview of the Transparency in Coverage Mandate and the No Surprises Act and facilitated the following questions:

  • How are you thinking about price transparency within a rather heavily regulated space?
  • What do you see as key issues and risks in the price transparency space? What’s the role of the 80/20 rule?Healthcare Price Transparency Regulations & Compliance, Policies, Programs, & Tools, Data Standards & Operational Considerations
  • How can we really focus on what health plan members and provider patients need to make good health care decisions, knowing that members and patients often have to navigate in antagonistic payer-provider environments?
  • How can we balance supporting patient needs and operate as an ongoing business while also informing people what things are going to cost before they have to spend unlimited amounts of money?
  • What unique challenges or strategies are you thinking about with respect to price transparency? And what opportunities are you looking to take advantage of regarding price transparency?

This post shares insight and information shared by roundtable participants on the above questions pertaining to the following categories:

  1. Regulations and compliance including their importance and value to various stakeholders
  2. Price transparency policies, programs, and tools
  3. Data standards and operational considerations to advance price transparency

A second post highlighting participant responses pertaining to the following categories will be shared shortly:

  1. Increasing adoption and the importance of end-user education and support
  2. Payer-provider relationships to support access to price transparency information
  3. Advancing healthcare price transparency and next steps

RELATED: Healthcare Leaders Focus on Healthcare Policy & ACA

Thoughts on Price Transparency Regulations & Compliance

As a payer and provider, I can look at other hospitals across the state and they’re not even using our latest pricing. They’re just putting something out there to meet the requirement. So, if there’s not consistency in the data, it doesn’t actually help anybody. It just creates profound confusion. (Health Plan/Provider)

Some of the things that I hear my peers talk about is: Are we just solving certain regulatory requirements or are we solving something members think they want but won’t actually be able to use in an effective way?  Or are we on a road to something that will be of value to all the parties involved? (Health Plan)

So, what are the different things people are putting out there? How do we then know this is the best? This is what we should be doing versus this is what we are doing. Because I think everybody is just trying to meet the intent of the law or the letter of the law, but a lot of people don’t know how. And so, I think that’s one of the things that we’ve got to [consider] if there’s anything we can do. (Technology/Service Provider)

These are people who are sick and injured and hurt and need health care. And we’ve got to do our part to help them out and we can do that in a way that drives our overall business priorities. This sets the floor. We talk about these mandates being a floor and you build an experience on top of that that supports your member needs and supports your patient’s needs. (Technology/Service Provider)

So, I think it’s a good thing that the conversation has started. But I think that the end product is going to be significantly different from what it is that we’re looking at this point. (Health Plan)

I feel like the price transparency is just a way to get our prices out there – for the most part as individuals [procedures]. Unless it’s very comparative in descriptions, information is really hard to compare apples to apples between hospitals. (Provider)

Healthcare Price Transparency Policies, Programs & Tools

Whenever I used to roll out tools and or guidance, probably two decades ago and in more than one state, you have to understand the nature of what it is that your end goal is. And sort of work backward from that. But just sort of putting some things out there, you end up getting exactly what you put into it. (Health Plan/Provider)

For a lot of these hospitals, putting out their prices shows major vulnerabilities for them when it comes to inappropriate pricing, when it comes to the contracts that they’re having. It does highlight the contracts that they have with their different vendors. (Technology/Service Provider)

I think some plans are in sort of this game of chicken to some extent because the No Surprises Act isn’t finalized yet. (Technology/Service Provider)

And how can we give voice to that as part of the overall conversation with the administration because I think they’re trying but they’re sort of missing the point. So, I think it’s incumbent upon us as an industry to start to respond back on all of those fronts as to how best to rethink how to do that since it started out previously and it’s been through lots of different iterations. But that lack of standards or consistency is just…(Health Plan)

Price Transparency Data Standards & Operational Considerations

From the payer or provider perspective, without somewhat more explicit data structure guidance across the board, it’s [price transparency mandate] not helpful. (Health Plan/Provider)

We need a standardization so that everybody can follow that. (Provider)

I don’t think you can do comparisons. It’s not the latest data. It’s not even the same from hospital to hospital. It’s kind of all over the place. (Health Plan/Provider)

So as an industry, I think whether that’s vendor-specific or provider, payer, or even consumer, I think I’d like to see a conversation around how do we drive to those data standards? (Health Plan/Provider)

I would agree that the majority of people and hospitals are doing that [trying to comply in good faith.] They don’t collect the data internally in ways that’s terribly helpful. So, to publish it [price transparency information] requires an infrastructure that frankly many of them don’t have in a way that makes it useful as say maybe a payer would. (Health Plan/Provider)

Healthcare is local, that’s very much true. So that’ll impact the dynamics and the impact of what price transparency brings to the table. (Thought Leader)

There are operational challenges that we have to address and plan to address to be compliant with the new regulations that the question becomes: How will this look and feel to the consumer because pricing can vary so significantly? (Health Plan)

One of the challenges that we see when we engage with plans is: Who are the folks and entities within the organization that are trying to solve this problem? We’ve got to get fee schedules from your contracting folks, and you need member eligibility and claims verification. You had to pull all these different systems together and that’s been one of the things we’ve seen as a big challenge – especially with bigger payers, these big vast entities that have to solve these problems with groups that really hardly ever talk to each other. (Technology/Service Provider)

Join a Focus Area Roundtable – Connect with Healthcare Peers

Additional Focus Area Roundtables on Costs & Transparency – and other 2021 HCEG Top 10+ focus areas such as Healthcare Policy & ACA, Interoperability, and M & A /Joint Ventures, among others – will take place throughout 2021. If you are interested in participating, reach out to us via email or complete this short form to indicate your interests.

To receive recaps of our Focus Area Roundtables and other information of potential use for leaders of health plans, health systems, and healthcare provider organizations, join our newsletter.

Healthcare System Interoperability – The Key To The Care We All Strive For

By | Events, Resources, Sponsor | No Comments

What does it feel like to be a patient, provider, pharmacist, and payer in a world where interoperability is not always a reality? What improvements can be expected by healthcare stakeholders in a world where interoperability is vast?

In our October Webinar Series event – The Care We All Strive For: The Impact of Interoperability – our sponsor Surescripts helped to address the two above questions via a short two-act skit. Four fictional healthcare stakeholders – a patient, a provider, a pharmacist, and a health plan executive – each shared their experiences with how interoperability helps to address the Quadruple Aim: enriching the patient experience, improving outcomes, addressing costs, and maintaining provider well-being.Surescripts. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. HCEG Webinar Series October 2020. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability. Prior Authorizations. Quadruple Aim Triple Aim.This blog post recaps a portion of this two-act skit and presents some highlights.

Access the entire recording here.

Two-Acts: Healthcare System Interoperability – Before & After

In Act I of the skit, each of the actors shared their experience in a world where interoperability is not a widespread reality – a world that most healthcare stakeholders experience today. In Act II, they shared how enhanced interoperability can improve the experience and well-being of not only patients and but also providers while reducing administrative and financial burdens and enhancing clinical outcomes – the four goals of the Quadruple Aim.

Highlights of Act I – Navigating Today’s Processes (Before)

Each stakeholder shared their experience living and working in a healthcare environment where interoperability is lacking:

Patient Carlos Garcia expressed his experience and concerns about alternative medication availability and cost:

  1. Need to repeat medical and medication history with each new provider
  2. Difficulty obtaining info on more cost-effective medication alternatives
  3. Lapses in medication adherence due to cost and/or delays at the pharmacySurescripts. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. HCEG Webinar Series October 2020. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability. Prior Authorizations. Quadruple Aim Triple Aim.

Physician Dr. Natalie Pinter, Carlos Garcia’s PCP, noted difficult prior authorization processes and lack of access to benefits information:

  1. Administrative processes take time away from patient interaction
  2. Lack of benefits information makes identifying cheaper therapeutic alternatives more difficult
  3. Cumbersome prior authorization processes – particularly for specialty medications

Pharmacist Keisha Wright also expressed concerns about over-reliance on faxes and administrative burdens:

  1. Challenges with incomplete patient information
  2. Delays in filling prescriptions – particularly specialty medications – due to unwieldy prior authorization processes

VP of Pharmacy at Carlos’s health plan, Oscar Gustafsson, noted impacts his health plan pharmacy operations:

  1. Involve a heavy, over-reliance on faxes to communicate with physicians and pharmacists
  2. Challenges assisting with member medication adherence and addressing gaps
  3. Difficulty assisting members with optimizing the use of their health plan benefits

Navigating Today’s Healthcare Process is a Challenge for Everyone

After Act I, the emcee of the performance – Melissa Warnke, Director PBM-Pharmacy, Health Plan Segment Marketing of Surescripts – shared some recent statistics supporting how insufficient interoperability impacts patients, providers, pharmacists, and health plan payers.Surescripts. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. HCEG Webinar Series October 2020. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability. Prior Authorizations. Quadruple Aim Triple Aim.

Access the entire recording here.

Highlights of Act II – The Care We All Strive For (After)

In the 2nd act, the healthcare stakeholders shared how broad healthcare system interoperability would change stakeholder experience:

Health plan VP of Pharmacy Oscar noted improvements and efficiencies gained in health plan operations:

  1. Allows for timely delivery of medication adherence gaps directly into the workflow of physicians
  2. Ability to share member-specific benefit information to physicians at the point of care
  3. Faster, “faxless” processing and turnaround of prior authorizations

Patient Carlos noted positive impacts on his physician office visit, cost of his medications, and obtaining his medications:

  1. Ability to provide patient medical and medication history to new physicians and pharmacists
  2. Faster, less administratively intense prescriptions – particularly specialty medications – and refills of existing prescriptions
  3. Opportunity to save money with therapeutic alternatives

Physician Dr. Natalie revealed improved ability patient information, reduced administrative work, & more time with her patient:

  1. Patient medical info, medication history, and adherence gaps available electronically in advance of a patient encounter
  2. Electronically accessible benefit plan information facilitates identification and prescription of more cost-effective medication and treatment alternatives
  3. Submitting prior authorizations electronically without faxing
  4. Submitting prescriptions for specialty medications electronically to the pharmacy

Pharmacist Keisha Wright noted reduced patient data collection and streamlined medication processing:

  1. Complete patient and prior authorization info received electronically
  2. More timely processing – especially with specialty medications – allows for more time counseling patients

The Care We All Strive For – The Vast Reality of Improved Healthcare System Interoperability

At the conclusion of Act II, Surescripts Melissa Warnke shared an overview of the vast impact that improved interoperability can have on increasing the transactions that help address the Quadruple Aim. Melissa also shared some additional statistics showing the growing pervasiveness of interoperability. Click images to expand.

Surescripts. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. HCEG Webinar Series October 2020. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability. Prior Authorizations. Quadruple Aim Triple Aim. Surescripts. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. HCEG Webinar Series October 2020. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability is a Reality. Prior Authorizations. Quadruple Aim Triple Aim.

A Faxless Future: Dare We Dream?

After Melissa recapped Act II, a short, light-hearted video was played showing how fax machines might be re-purposed for a useful life after they retire from their long-running service to the healthcare industry. The following are a few examples of how fax machines might serve a new role.  See the short video “A Faxless Future: Dare We Dream.”

Surescripts. The Faxless Future. Artifax. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability is a Reality. Surescripts. The Faxless Future. Artifax. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability is a Reality. Surescripts. The Faxless Future. Artifax. The Care We All Strive For – Navigating an Interoperable Healthcare System. Specialty Pharmacy. Interoperability is a Reality.

Questions from the Audience on Healthcare System Interoperability

After the video was played, emcee Melissa Warnke fielded some questions submitted by attendees. Here are a few of the questions and their responses:

  1. What have you seen as the best practices for driving the kind of behavior change from providers, pharmacists, and others that obtaining maximum value from increased interoperability takes?

Answer: 32:03 to 34:50

  1. Without a sales pitch, what are the new tools that the provider and pharmacist actors are alluding to that to speed the implementation and adoption of interoperability?

Answer: 37:08 to 40:07

  1. How has COVID-19 impacted the transaction counts (real-time benefit inquiries, medication history transmittals, clinical direct messages) you presented after Act II?

Answer: 41:45 to 45:16

  1. Can pharmacists see the same real-time prescription benefit info as providers?

Answer: 45:39 to 47:33

Connect & Interact w/ Our Sponsor Surescripts & HealthCare Executive Group

Our Webinar Series events are one example of how the HealthCare Executive Group helps to share information and promote collaboration between healthcare leaders, change-makers, and other stakeholders serving the healthcare industry.

For more information on the topics presented by Surescripts in our October Webinar Series:

Learn more about the HealthCare Executive Group and to stay abreast of challenges, issues, and opportunities facing the healthcare industry in 2021 and beyond:

Webinar: The Care We All Strive For: The Impact of Interoperability

By | Events, Sponsor | No Comments

Has 2020 given you webinar fatigue? The seemingly endless run of virtual events and webinars would certainly justify it. And while moving everything to the digital world has its challenges, society is embracing technology and making the most of the situation. Healthcare is no exception. With the expanded use of technology, healthcare has been reminded of the importance of being able to communicate with each other quickly, efficiently, and easily.

In our October Webinar Series event, The Care We All Strive For: The Impact of Interoperability, we will help fight that webinar fatigue by taking a break from the traditional webinar structure and take time to revisit our shared purpose – to make healthcare run better for everyone.

Please join us on Wednesday, October 28th at 11:00 am PT / 2:00 pm ET to hear the story of what it feels like to be a patient, provider, pharmacist, and payer in a world where interoperability is a reality.

Our sponsor Surescripts will be joined by four healthcare stakeholders who will share their take on the difference interoperability makes on the experience of a patient, provider, pharmacist, and payer. The panelists will examine how sharing information across stakeholders can reduce administrative burden and improve member experience.*:

Carlos Garcia Dr. Natalie Pinter Keisha Wright, RPh Oscar Gustafsson
Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis & Hypertension Provider Pharmacist, Specialty Pharmacy Vice President of Pharmacy, Payer

Over the next four weeks leading up to the live webinar on October 28th, we’ll be sharing more information on how patients, providers, pharmacists, and payers all benefit from enhanced interoperability of data and systems. In the meantime, learn more about how Surescripts addresses healthcare interoperability challenges here.

* These are imaginary personas whose role in this webinar will be performed by employees of our sponsor Surescripts.

Recapping: Towards Next-Generation Care: The Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Clinic

By | Events, Resources, Sponsor | No Comments

Currently, people with back and joint pain experience a fragmented approach to care. Whether it’s an acute injury, chronic pain, or surgery, members must contend with multiple providers and handoffs between those involved with providing a ‘whole person approach’ to care. From the individuals’ perspective, it feels like no one is looking at their health holistically or acting as their healthcare champion. And with many people increasingly working from home due to the coronavirus pandemic, challenges related to musculoskeletal conditions – increasing back pain and joint pain – are likely to increase.

Our September Webinar Series event was presented by Hinge Health’s CEO Dan Perez and addressed the following:

  • Key MSK Challenges & Trends in 2020 and Beyond
  • Fractured State of MSK Care
  • Towards Next-Generation Care
  • World’s Largest Digital MSK Cohort Clinical Study

This post is a recap of the webinar. Contact Hinge Health for access to the webinar recording

For more information on how a digital musculoskeletal clinic – covering the full continuum of care from prevention to post-surgery – can provide a one-stop-shop for health plans, employer groups, and provider organizations, reach out to Hinge Health.

Highlights from Towards Next-Generation Care: The Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Clinic

HCEG’s Executive Director Ferris Taylor kicked off the webinar noting how Hinge Health addresses 4 of the 2020 HCEG Top 10 list of challenges, issues, and opportunities facing healthcare leaders.HInge Health MSK Issues Musculoskeletal conditions

Dan Perez provided an overview of how musculoskeletal conditions continue to be the top health care cost driver and how MSK care will have the highest growth rate of any virtual care services over the next few years – and likely beyond. Dan went on to provide an overview of The Hinge Health Digital MSK Clinic, details on the four distinct Digital Care Pathways across the care continuum, and shared information on evidence-based care guidelines from the CDC and American College of Physicians.

RELATED: Spotlight on Musculoskeletal (MSK) Programs – Hinge Health

Chronic MSK Pain is Both Physical & Mental

Dan shared information, statistics, and Hinge Health insight on the Gold Standard for Addressing Chronic MSK Pain: a biopsychosocial approach that addresses three key components:

Biological Influence

How exercise therapy can help reduce chronic pain by up to 60%

Psychological Influence

How a belief in oneself often leads to lower pain levels – even 1 to 2 years after the initial intervention

Social Influence

How education and 3rd-party support can empower people to overcome chronic pain

Clinical Care Model Surrounding an Individual

The presentation continued with Dan sharing an overview of the clinical care model upon which Hinge Health’s care model is based. He shared a 1-minute video with webinar participants offering a real-world application of the Hinge Health solution.

The World’s Largest Digital MSK Cohort Study

Details on clinical outcomes from a study of 10,264 participants – validated by researchers at Stanford, Vanderbilt, and top consultants addressing key business questions – were shared:

  • 4 out of 5 participants had meaningful improvement in pain reduction
  • More exercise therapy and coaching resulted in more pain reduction
  • 58% Reduction in depression and anxiety scores
  • More than 2 out of 3 surgeries avoided in Year-1

The presentation concluded with key takeaways on how health plans, employer groups, provider organizations, and other healthcare stakeholders can help their members and patients.

Learn How Hinge Health Can Help Address Costly MSK Issues

To access the webinar recording and for more information on how a digital musculoskeletal clinic – covering the full continuum of care from prevention to post-surgery – can provide a one-stop-shop for members and health plans reach out to Hinge Health.

Our Webinar Series events are one example of how the HealthCare Executive Group helps to share information and promote collaboration between healthcare leaders, change-makers, and stakeholders. Consider joining our newsletter to stay abreast of challenges, issues, and opportunities of importance.

Physician Perspectives on COVID-19 Impact to Fall Season

Webinar: Physician Perspectives on COVID-19 Impact to Fall Season

By | Events, Resources | No Comments

In early September, the HealthCare Executive Group hosted an informal discussion with three physician executives. Long-time HCEG board member Dr. David Diloreto, MD, a board-certified ophthalmologist, ophthalmic plastic surgeon, currently a principal at Vizient/Sg2 and prior senior vice-president at GE Healthcare Camden was joined by Dr. Johanna Vidal-Phelan, MD Senior Medical Director in Pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health Plan and a practicing pediatrician at Hamilton Health Center, an FQHC in Harrisburg, PA.and Dr. Jason Woo, MD, a practicing board-certified obstetrician/gynecologist and a veteran with 31 years in the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service and consultant at the Arbinger Institute.

The discussion was centered on COVID-19’s impact over the past months, what’s changed, what’s remained the same, and what they’ve each observed and learned over the past months – particularly from a clinical and public health role. The following topics were discussed:

Impact Factors Affecting Utilization of Services The Change to Telehealth: New Opportunities for Providers to Connect with Patients
Balancing Treatment to Avoid Ongoing Destruction of Demand for Non-COVID Services Rethinking the Healthcare Supply-Chain – PPE as a Matter of Trust
Returning to School & Addressing Disadvantaged Populations Lessons Learned and Lessons to Be Learned
A Pediatric Physician on Sending Kids – Including Her Own – Back to School Experiences from Southern Hemisphere – Seasonal Viruses at All-Time Lows
Impacts on Minorities & Underserved Populations Value of Encouraging Use of Masks
Uncertainty in Testing and Understanding Prevalence ‘Long Haulers’ – The Unknown, Long-Term Impact of COVID-19
How Long Will We Be Dealing with COVID-19? Financial Impact on Providers, Employer Groups, & Payers
COVID-10 Vaccines & Importance of Fall Flu Shots Employers Forced into New Reimbursement Models
Avoiding Other Illnesses or a Different Pandemic – Maintain Immunizations Delayed Demand for Non-COVID Services
Vaccinations for Underserved Populations – Messaging is Key

The information, insight, ideas, and predictions from this informal discussion are presented in a 3-part blog series and you can read Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.

Live, Interactive Chat and Q & A – Physician Perspectives on COVID-19

Join this special October event, interact with and ask questions of these physicians Tuesday, October 13, 2020, at 11:00 am PT/2:00 pm ET. Questions and requests for additional information shared by registrants prior to and/or during the live chat will be fielded by the panelists.

Reserve your seat and submit your questions and comments today!

Webinar: Towards Next-Generation Care: The Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Clinic

By | Events | No Comments

Currently, health plan members with back and joint pain experience a fragmented approach to care. Whether it’s an acute injury, chronic pain, or surgery, members must contend with multiple providers and handoffs between those involved with providing a ‘whole-person approach’ to care. From the members’ perspective, it feels like no one is looking at their health holistically or acting as their healthcare champion.

Join us and other healthcare leaders for our September Webinar Series Event: Towards Next-Generation Care: The Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Clinic on Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 11:00 am PT / 2:00 pm ET.

In this webinar, Hinge Health’s CEO Dan Perez will discuss how a digital musculoskeletal clinic covering the full continuum of care from prevention to post-surgery can provide a one-stop shop for members and health plans. Register today and learn how to improve outcomes, engage your members and lower costs!

Webinar Discussion Topics

  1. Current MSK Challenges
  2. Fragmented Continuum of Care
  3. The Digital MSK Clinic
  4. Deep Dive: Chronic MSK Digital Pathway
  5. Insights from the World’s Largest Digital MSK Cohort Clinical Study
Healthcare Innovation and Disruption, HealthCare Executive Group, HCEG, 16th Annual World Health Care Congress (WHCC), CIO & CTO Strategy Track, innovation, disruption. healthcare champions, Data Analytics, Pharmacy Costs and Transparency, Importance of Useable Technology, Cybersecurity, HCEG Top 10, Center for Healthcare Innovation (CHI), International Association of Innovation Professionals,

To learn more, read about Overcoming Chronic Pain: The Hinge Health Clinical Model of Care.

Presenters

Dan Perez is CEO and Co-Founder of Hinge Health
Dan Perez Ferris Taylor <Announced Soon>
CEO and Co-Founder of Hinge Health Executive Director, HealthCare Executive Group Hinge Health Customer

More About Hinge Health & The Digital Clinical Model of Care

Read this recent Sponsor Spotlight on Musculoskeletal (MSK) Programs to learn more about Hinge Health and how failures in the continuum of MSK care are addressed with a patient-centered Digital Clinic for back & joint pain.Spotlight on Musculoskeletal (MSK) Programs – Hinge Health Contact Hinge Health here

 

Visit Hinge Health’s Website

Connect with Hinge Health on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook